‘Slimeball’ Presidents Club ‘failed’ in charity duties

'Slimeball' Presidents Club 'failed' in charity duties

The controversial Presidents Club event saw women, hired through an agency, told to wear black underwear and sexy black shoes to work as hostesses for their shift.

Undercover reporting from the Financial Times revealed alleged incidents of sexual harassment from those on the all-men guest list at the fundraising event, which auctioned off sports cars and lunches with politicians.

The Presidents Club scrapped all planned events after the video footage and report emerged, and said it would distribute money raised among various charities.

A Charity Commission report into the event said The trustees failed fully to recognise or address risks to the reputation of the charity – and its purpose of raising money for good causes – arising from holding an all-male event staffed by female-only event staff, who were subject to instructions on their appearance, including that they wear ‘smart, sexy shoes’.

The commission added the failure of the trustees to put clear or adequate procedures in place to deal with harassment allegations was in stark contrast to the privacy it granted those on the guest list.

But the report does say there is no evidence to suggest the trustees acted in bad faith or with anything other but the best interests of the charity at heart.

Helen Stephenson, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said The allegations made about the event were entirely at odds with what we would expect from any charity when raising funds for such important causes.

Our report should serve as a warning to others that raising funds for charity does not absolve trustees of their legal duties or moral responsibilities.

The commission admitted no one else came forward with allegations after it called for information after the Financial Times report.

Theresa May I thought Presidents Club approach to women was being ‘left behind’

A spokesman for the trustees said We are also surprised at both the report’s muted acknowledgement of the fact that not a single complainant has come forward since the FT’s article was published, and at the weight of credibility it gives to the FT’s reporting of the 2018 dinner.

The core issues investigated by the Charity Commission in coming to its conclusions concern perceptions rather than any proven facts. We, as trustees, have never and would never condone the sort of alleged behaviour described in the FT article.

The trustees, named on the Charity Commission website as David Meller, Harvey Soning and Bruce Ritchie, said they would comply with the action plan in the report.

Hosts were reportedly told to wear skimpy black dresses and matching underwear, with one told by a guest she was far too sober. He then declared I want you to down that glass, rip off your knickers and dance on that table.

The event was dubbed a lady zoo for slimeballs by furious MPs, with minister Anne Milton admitting Words fail me.

Mr Meller is the chairman of the Meller group, a luxury home and beauty supplier. He was also a non-executive board member for the Department for Education until January.

Mr Soning, 72, is a property developer who chairs the James Andrew agency, which he founded in 1974.

Mr Ritchie is the chief executive of the Residential Land Group and was previously the joint owner with Marco Pierre White of the White Star Line restaurant group.

Over 33 years, the Presidents Club’s dinners had raised around £18m for charities including Great Ormond Street Hospital.

News Source SkyNews

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

We use cookies to personalize your user experience and to study how our website is being used. Learn More About Cookies Okay I Got It